Home > Review Issues > Māori Health Review Issue 17
Māori Health Review Issue 17

Māori Health Review Issue 17

Authors:

Tënā koutou, tënā koutou, tënā tātou katoa
Nau mai ki tenei Tirohanga hou Hauora Māori. He rangahau tuhi hou e paa ana ki nga
hau ora a ki te oratanga o te Māori. No reira noho ora mai raa i o koutou waahi noho
a waahi mahi hoki. Otira ka mhih aroha ki a Paratene Ngata ratou ko Ngaroma me a
raua tamariki mokopuna.
Noho ora mai
Matire

Greetings

Warm greetings to you all and welcome to Māori Health Review. We are delighted so many people have subscribed to this publication recently and welcome all our new readers.

Stay well, regards

Matire
Dr Matire Harwood
matire@maorihealthreview.co.nz

In this issue:
A randomized trial of nicotine nasal spray in adolescent smokers
Authors:
Summary:

The feasibility and utility of using nicotine nasal spray for adolescent smokers who wanted to quit smoking was examined in a cohort of 40 adolescents aged 15–18 years who smoked ≥5 cigarettes/day for ≥6 months. They were randomly assigned to receive either weekly counselling alone (control) for 8 weeks or 8 weeks of counselling plus 6 weeks of nicotine nasal spray. At 12 weeks, no betweengroup differences were observed in cessation rates, the numbers of cigarettes smoked per day, or salivary cotinine levels. Fifty-seven percent of participants stopped using their spray after only 1 week. The most commonly reported adverse effect was nasal irritation and burning (34.8%) followed by complaints about the taste and smell (13%).

Comment:
A useful paper for those of us working with or supporting ‘smoking cessation’ programmes (GPs, nurses, quit coaches, etc). Adolescents in particular should be supported to quit smoking with therapies that they can sustain. It appears that adolescents are most likely to stop a prescribed treatment fairly early (1 week) and so a recommendation would be to check ‘compliance’ with long-term therapies after 1 week, rather than waiting 3 months for this particular population.
Reference: Pediatrics. 2008;122(3):e595-600
Linking mother and child access to dental care
Authors:
Summary:

This study sought to determine whether children who have mothers with a regular source of dental care at baseline have greater dental use in the subsequent year than children with mothers without a regular source, in a cohort of 11,305 children aged 3 to 6 years in low-income families covered by Medicaid. There were 4 racial/ethnic groups: black (3791), Hispanic (2806), white (1902), and other racial/ethnic groups (2806). Approximately 38% of the mothers had a regular source of dental care (RSDC) at baseline. Having a mother with an RSDC at baseline was associated with greater odds of the child’s receiving dental care in the subsequent year, after controlling for potentially confounding variables. Mothers’ RSDC was also associated with children’s receiving more preventive services. These associations were found for children with black and Hispanic mothers; for children with white mothers, the relationships were in the same direction but not statistically significant.

Comment:
A significant paper in oral health that also highlights the need to support ‘whānau ora’. Access to dental health services for children, and with anticipation oranga niho, may be improved when mums are supported to access dental services. Financial assistance appears to be particularly important.
Reference: Pediatrics. 2008;122(4):e805-14
Ethnic stereotypes and the underachievement of UK medical students from ethnic minorities: qualitative study
Authors:
Summary:

These researchers explored ethnic stereotypes of UK medical students in the context of academic underachievement of medical students from ethnic minorities, in a cohort of Year 3 medical students and their clinical teachers, purposively sampled for ethnicity and sex. They participated in one to one interviews and focus groups. Analyses revealed that the clinical teachers as well as the medical students themselves had negative stereotypes about UK Asian medical students, who were perceived as being over-reliant on book learning and excessively quiet in class. Students also reported being unable to learn from unenthusiastic or intimidating teachers. No evidence of direct discrimination was found.

Comment:
A noteworthy paper that was published in a recent BMJ. Interestingly, stereotypes for the ethnic ‘minority’ were not only more negative but also more developed than those for ‘white’ students. The fact that teachers had the same negative ‘stereotypical’ ideas about ‘Asian’ students is somewhat unsettling, particularly if it impacts on knowledge transfer. It also confirms the need for clinical teachers to be culturally safe.
Reference: BMJ. 2008;337:a1220
Effects of improved home heating on asthma in community dwelling children: randomised controlled trial
Authors:
Summary:

These researchers investigated the effects of installing non-polluting, more effective heating (heat pump, wood pellet burner, flued gas) before winter in the homes of 409 children aged 6–12 years with doctor-diagnosed asthma; a control group received a replacement heater at the end of the trial. Although there were no significant improvements in lung function, there were significant reductions in asthma symptoms and time lost from school and reductions in dry cough at night and sleep disturbed by wheeze, among children in the intervention group compared with those in the control group. In addition, the intervention was associated with higher indoor temperatures and lower nitrogen dioxide levels delivered by the heating than measurements taken from the control households.

Comment:
Further evidence from the Wellington School of Medicine about the improvements in health outcomes for children when an effective and non-polluting (compared with open fire for example) heating system was introduced in the home.
Reference: BMJ. 2008;337:a1411
Are behavioral interventions for arthritis effective with minorities? Addressing racial and ethnic diversity in disability and rehabilitation
Authors:
Summary:

These researchers systematically reviewed research published between 1997 and 2008 evaluating the effectiveness of behavioural interventions for arthritis, to determine whether these interventions are effective with, and appropriately utilised by, minority participants. Among 25 randomised intervention studies, only 2 reported on whether the intervention was similarly effective for white and black patients (equal effectiveness was found), and 6 studies reported examining differences in attrition by race (higher attrition in nonwhites was found in 1 study). Most studies did not report the percentage of participants from specific minority groups, and in many studies the percentage of minority participants was small. There were no reports of attempts to make interventions culturally appropriate.

Comment:
Hospitalisation rates for arthritis (including gout, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis) are higher for Māori than non-Māori. As the authors state here, not only is there little evidence about the cultural appropriateness of arthritis treatments, but ethnic minorities do not have access to intervention research. The benefits of participating in such research may include access to expensive treatments (not readily available to all), improved quality of care (with increased follow up and access to investigations) and better information/education about managing the disease.
Reference: Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59(10):1512-8
Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework
Authors:
Summary:

These researchers examined the relation between socioeconomic inequalities and delivered quality of clinical care under the quality and outcomes framework, a financial incentive scheme that remunerates general practices in the UK for their performance against a set of quality indicators. Overall levels of achievement, defined as the proportion of patients who were deemed eligible by the general practices for whom the targets were achieved, were calculated for 48 clinical activity indicators during the first 3 years of the incentive scheme (from 2004–05 to 2006–07). Median overall reported achievement was 85.1% in year 1, 89.3% in year 2, and 90.8% in year 3. In year 1, median achievement was higher in least deprived areas (quintile 1; 86.8%) than in most deprived areas (quintile 5; to 82.8%). However, between years 1 and 3, median achievement increased by a greater amount in quintile 5 than in quintile 1 (4.4% vs 7.6%), and the gap in median achievement narrowed from 4.0% to 0.8%. A significant inverse association was observed between the increase in achievement during this time and practice performance in previous years (p<0·0001); no such association was seen with area deprivation (p=0.062).

Comment:
Many of us working in primary care have watched the UK Quality and Outcomes model with interest, particularly the provision of financial incentives to those practices that meet the clinical indicators. These include things like recording smoking status, the percentage of patients with an MI on ACE inhibitors and so on. The fact that such incentives may be associated with reduced inequalities suggests that it is perhaps something we should be exploring further here in Aotearoa.
Reference: Lancet. 2008;372(9640):728-36
The menopause symptom profile of Māori and non-Māori women in New Zealand
Authors:
Summary:

Data were analysed from 3616 women aged 49–70 years in a study that enrolled 27 primary care practices and from the multinational WISDOM trial of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT), in order to describe menopause symptoms in postmenopausal Māori and non-Māori New Zealand women, and explore relationships between symptoms, sociodemographic profile and postmenopausal HRT use. While Māori and non-Māori differed in demographic and clinical characteristics, few differences were observed in the frequency of menopause-related symptoms. Vasomotor symptoms were reported by 34.4% of women, with no statistically significant difference between Māori and non-Māori (p>0.05). Compared to non-Māori, Māori were less likely to have ever used HRT (24% vs 54%) and to be current HRT users (5% vs 30%; p<0.05).

Comment:
An important study reporting on ethnic inequalities for menopausal women in NZ. Often cited by clinicians as the main reason for treatment inequalities, the study has already adjusted for some ‘clinical factors’ and shown that this does not fully explain the disparities between Māori and non-Māori. Other factors to be considered include provider preference (which anecdotally appears to be an issue) and patient preference. Dr Beverley Lawton at the Wellington School of Medicine recommends the following website for women wanting more information about menopausal symptoms and management – www.menopause.org.au.
Reference: Climacteric. 2008;11(6):467-74

Latest Reviews

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Tēnā koutou katoa Nau mai, haere mai ki a Arotake Hauora Māori. We aim to

Tēnā koutou katoa Nau mai, haere mai ki a Arotake Hauora Māori. We aim to

Tēnā koutou katoa Nau mai, haere mai ki a Arotake Hauora Māori. We aim to

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.