Home > Review Articles > Risk-taking: behind the warrior gene story

Risk-taking: behind the warrior gene story

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This report examines the scientific evidence behind the recent controversial claim by Lea and colleagues (see below for a link to the on-line abstract) that the low activity variant of the monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A) gene was strongly associated with risk-taking and aggressive behaviour in Mäori. The MAO-A gene is believed to be important for the correct regulation of dopamine and serotonin levels, via the production of the MAO-A enzyme which breaks down both neurotransmitters. The high activity gene variant (found in 65% of Caucasians) has up to a 10-fold greater activity than the low activity variant, and may therefore be more effective in removing excess dopamine and serotonin. In MAO-A deficient mice (which lack the enzyme entirely), dopamine and serotonin levels are increased and aggressive behaviours have been observed. The term “warrior gene” was first coined following a small, un-replicated experiment using Rhesus macaque monkeys. No evidence for an association between genotype alone and aggressive behavior was found in this study, and aggressive behaviour could be predicted by both low and high-activity gene variants under different environmental conditions. In the three largest population-based studies in humans (all in Caucasians) the results were all similar and suggested the high-activity MAO-A variant may be protective against adult anti-social behavior for children who were abused or neglected. The low-activity variant did not predict aggressive behaviour unless these additional environmental factors were also considered. The study presented by Lea et al. was conducted in a very small (n = 17) sample of Mäori males. They found the low-activity MAO-A variant present in 60% of subjects, and called it the “warrior allele”, suggesting it was strongly associated with risk taking and aggressive behaviour in Mäori males. The authors of the current report, dispute this finding, citing a lack of scientific rigour and an absence of appropriate genetic epidemiological experiments testing for an association. They also point to evidence of racial variation between genetic associations indicating that results from a Caucasian population should not be extrapolated to Mäori.

Comment:
Hall D, Green M, Chambers G, Lea R. Tracking the evolutionary history of the warrior gene in the South Pacific. 11 th International Human Genetics Meeting, Brisbane, Australia; August 6–10; 2006. Abstract at URL: http://www.ichg2006.com/abstract/843.htm
Reference: JNZMA. 2007; 120(1250)
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.