Home > Review Articles > Delayed time to defibrillation after inhospital cardiac arrest

Delayed time to defibrillation after inhospital cardiac arrest

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

These researchers examined data from 6,789 patients who had cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia at 369 hospitals participating in the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, to determine the prevalence of delayed defibrillation (>2 minutes) in the US and its effect on survival. The overall median time to defibrillation was 1 minute; delayed defibrillation occurred in 2,045 patients (30.1%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the following characteristics as being associated with delayed defibrillation; Black race, noncardiac admitting diagnosis, and occurrence of cardiac arrest at a hospital with <250 beds, in an unmonitored hospital unit, and during after-hours periods (5 p.m. to 8 a.m. or weekends). After adjusting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics, significantly fewer patients survived to hospital discharge when defibrillation was delayed than when it was not (22.2% vs 39.3%). In addition, a graded association was seen between increasing time to defibrillation and lower rates of survival to hospital discharge for each minute of delay (p for trend <0.001).

Comment:
Although we don’t know the exact number of in-hospital cardiac arrests, US authors suggest that it is double that of out-of-hospital arrests. Survival after cardiac arrest due to an arrhythmia requires prompt defibrillation (electric shock). This study set a time limit of 2 minutes (many studies use 3 minutes). Defibrillation after 2 minutes was associated with poor outcome even after co-existing conditions (such as underlying heart or kidney disease) were taken into account. Importantly, African American patients were more likely to have delayed treatment, confirming unequal treatment by ethnicity. The other take home message for me is that physicians spending time worrying about improving out-of-hospital care should perhaps refocus their attention on improving outcomes for hospitalised patients.
Reference: N Engl J Med. 2008;358:9-17
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.