Home > Review Articles > Lung cancer > Ethnic differences in the management of lung cancer in New Zealand

Ethnic differences in the management of lung cancer in New Zealand

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This audit of secondary care management in Auckland and Northland of lung cancer patients diagnosed in 2004 aimed to assess whether management differences exist according to different ethnic groups, which may contribute to ethnic survival disparities. Of 565 eligible cases, 378 were European (67%), 95 were Mäori (17%), 56 Pacific Peoples (10%), 23 Asian (4%), and 13 other or unknown ethnicity (2%). Multivariate analyses adjusted for tumour and patient factors including comorbidity revealed that Mäori were 2.5 times more likely to have locally advanced disease than localised disease compared with Europeans (p<0.01), and four times less likely to receive curative rather than palliative anticancer treatment compared with Europeans (p<0.01). Mäori had longer transit times from diagnosis to treatment (p<0.001). Mäori were more likely to decline treatment and miss appointments than Europeans, although this only partially explained management differences.

Comment:
This highlights the importance of undertaking clinical audit along the care pathway – particularly in lung cancer management given that it is a leading cause of cancer and deaths for Mäori. ‘Declining’ or missing appointments occurs for any number of reasons, many of them outside the patient’s control. Despite this, many clinicians and reception staff record ‘DID NOT ATTEND’ or ‘DNA’ in the patient notes without further information. Some clinicians admit that they are more likely to negatively stereotype a patient with ‘DNA’ recorded in their notes as non-compliant/difficult. Whether this has implications in the delivery of care is yet to be determined. Studies to explain unequal treatment rates between Mäori and non-Mäori are currently underway for IHD, colon cancer and other diseases – perhaps similar research in lung cancer should be a priority.
Reference: Journal Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:237-44
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

A cross-sectional survey of Māori found that participants generally supported using blood samples in lung

Māori with advanced non-small cell lung cancer are less likely to receive first line targeted

A nationwide project has identified a number of disparities along the lung cancer treatment pathway

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.