Home > Review Articles > Are the processes recommended by the NHMRC for improving Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people being implemented?: an assessment of CR Services across Western Australia

Are the processes recommended by the NHMRC for improving Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people being implemented?: an assessment of CR Services across Western Australia

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

Recommendations issued in 2005 by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Strengthening Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: A Guide for Health Professionals, have been poorly implemented in Western Australia (WA) within mainstream health services. Semi-structured interviews held between November 2007 and June 2008 with 24 health professionals involved in the WA Directory of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) services sought to describe health professionals’ awareness, implementation, and perspectives of barriers to implementing these recommendations. Most respondents reported unfamiliarity with the NHMRC guidelines; thus, there was minimal implementation of the recommendations and inconsistent application. Respondents provided few in-patient CR-related services to Indigenous patients, services upon discharge were erratic, and few Indigenous-specific resources were provided for patients. Issues relating to workforce, cultural competence, and service linkages emerged as having most impact on design and delivery of CR services for Indigenous people in WA.

Comment:
came across it! The Australian Indigenous Health Infonet is ‘helping to close the gap by providing the evidence base’ – similar to Māori Health Research Review but more flash! I think it’s a great resource, particularly the Health Bulletin and Australian Indigenous Bibliography sections. I hope readers find it useful also. http://www.healthinfonet.ecu.edu.au/ I’ve selected two papers from the website. The first paper highlights the need for comprehensive implementation of clinical guidelines in order for Indigenous people to benefit from them. It is well documented that guideline implementation is a complex and multifaceted process. Strategies such as involving consumers and professional groups, implementing technological solutions, as well as providing incentives have been shown to be successful. But as the authors state, the lack of awareness and involvement with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services among most respondents will also limit the capacity to coordinate services.
Reference: Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6:29.
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.