Home > Review Articles > Cancer > Differences in breast cancer survival between public and private care in New Zealand: Which factors contribute?

Differences in breast cancer survival between public and private care in New Zealand: Which factors contribute?

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This analysis examined data from all women who were diagnosed with primary breast cancer in the Auckland and Waikato District Health Board Regions between June 2000 and May 2013. Patients who received public care for primary treatment, mostly surgical treatment, were compared with those who received private care in terms of demographics, mode of presentation, disease factors, comorbidity index and treatment factors. The analysis included 14,468 patients, 8,916 (61.6%) of whom received public care. Compared to patients treated in private care facilities, patients in the public sector were older, more likely to be Māori, Pacifika or Asian and to reside in deprived neighbourhoods and rural areas. Patients in the public sector were also less likely to be diagnosed through screening, less likely to be diagnosed with early staged cancer and to receive timely cancer treatments. They were more likely to have comorbidities. They were less likely to receive breast conserving surgery with radiotherapy but more likely to have mastectomy without radiotherapy, or no primary surgery, even after adjusting for stage at diagnosis and other tumour factors. They were also less likely to receive chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Moreover, patients in the public sector had a higher risk of mortality from breast cancer (HR 1.95; 95% CI, 1.75 to 2.17), of which 80% was explained by baseline differences, particularly related to ethnicity, stage at diagnosis and type of loco-regional therapy. After controlling for these demographic, disease and treatment factors, the risk of mortality remained 14% higher in the public sector patients.

Comment:
This paper addresses a common question raised in discussions about unequal treatment – does private care contribute to ethnic inequities in health care/outcomes. The authors’ conclusion, that it makes a significant difference, is both interesting and useful.
Reference: PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153206
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

A review of cancer diagnoses between 2007 and 2019 among individuals aged <25 years found

Māori with advanced non-small cell lung cancer are less likely to receive first line targeted

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.