Home > Review Articles > Mortality > The recent fall in postperinatal mortality in New Zealand and the Safe Sleep programme

The recent fall in postperinatal mortality in New Zealand and the Safe Sleep programme

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

Post-neonatal mortality in New Zealand has decreased by 29% from 2009 to 2015, reaching 2.0 deaths per 1000 live births in 2015, down from 2.8/1000 in 2009. Since 2009, the New Zealand Ministry of Health has encouraged Safe Sleep policies for application in real world conditions. This paper puts the case for these policies as contributing causes for the improvement in post-perinatal mortality outcomes. The Ministry of Health has introduced five intervention strands at different times since 2009 that aim to promote infant sleep, constituting a Safe Sleep programme that is a multimethod public health intervention: 1. An end-stage strategy to break the impasse on mortality changes 2. A ‘blitz’ approach to sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) education to achieve alignment, consistency and scale 3. An intervention focus on preventing accidental suffocation 4. The targeted supply of infant Safe Sleep devices (ISSDs) and Safe Sleep education 5. The development of Safe Sleep policies by District Health Boards. Over 2,600 health and community professionals each year for 4 years have participated in the SUDI education, equating to 1 participant per 23 live births. Safe Sleep leaflets have been distributed to families at more than twice the number of live births, and the number of Safe Sleep information cards designed for placement in hospital cots is approximately the number of babies born each year. In addition, over 16,500 ISSDs have been distributed to vulnerable infants. The fall since 2009 in post-neonatal mortality has been greatest for Māori and in regions with the most intensive programmes.

Comment:
A timely report highlighting the impact of targeted and Māori-led interventions. As Dame Tariana Turia recently remarked though, we need to consider the way our children are described – she prefers saying we have ‘valuable’ or ‘valued children’ and not ‘vulnerable children’.
Reference: Acta Paediatr. 2016;105(11):1312-20
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Rural-urban disparities in mortality in younger age groups cannot be explained by ethnicity or socioeconomic

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.