Home > Review Articles > Ethnic disparities > Predictors of medical student remediation and their underlying causes: early lessons from a curriculum change in the University of Auckland Medical Programme

Predictors of medical student remediation and their underlying causes: early lessons from a curriculum change in the University of Auckland Medical Programme

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

These researchers sought to identify what factors increase the likelihood of students requiring remediation during the University of Auckland medical programme, in this analysis of data from 2013 and 2014. Twenty-two lead faculty staff involved in medical student remediation were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews exploring their perspectives about the quality and effectiveness of the remediation work they are involved with. A recent reorganisation of the curriculum content places more emphasis on longitudinal learning and programmatic assessment. This ‘new’ curriculum was introduced in a staged fashion to Years 2 and 4 in 2013, Years 3 and 5 in 2014 and finally Year 6 in 2015. The analysis revealed that nearly one-fifth (17.7%) of all students required some form of remedial assistance and 93% of all students offered remediation passed their year of study. In a multivariate analysis of student demographics, those who were significantly more likely to require remediation were international students (OR 4.59; 95% CI, 2.62 to 7.98) and students admitted via the Māori and Pacific Admission Scheme (OR 3.43; 95% CI, 2.29 to 5.15). Male students were also slightly more likely than their female classmates to require assistance. No effect was observed for rural origin students, those with a prior degree or who had completed clinical placement in a peripheral hospital. Knowledge application and information synthesis were the most frequently identified underlying problems. Most faculty believed remediation was successful, however, suggested areas for improvements included flexibility in the programme structure, improved diagnostics and improved access to dedicated teaching staff.

Comment:
Just wanted to highlight a couple of things from these two related papers. First, ethnic inequities in graduate outcomes in Aotearoa exist and have long-term implications. And second, the reasons are complex and therefore multiple interventions will be required along the entire ‘pipeline’ (from school into and through tertiary
Reference: N Z Med J. 2017;130(1460):73-82
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Despite overall improvement in life expectancy in New Zealand, according to a cause-specific decomposition analysis

A retrospective study has highlighted ethnic disparities in the utilisation of epidural analgesia at Christchurch

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.