These researchers examined how four unhealthy commodity industries (alcohol, food, sugar-sweetened beverages and gambling) have used arguments about complexity in their public statements and documents to dispute their role the causation of public health issues. The analyses identified two main framings: (i) these industries argue that aetiology is so complex that individual products cannot be blamed; and (ii) they argue that population health measures are ‘too simple’ to address complex public health problems.
We have had a fair bit of industry reaction to public health issues recently (tobacco, sugar tax, and gambling, as examples) and should expect more to come. This paper provides a useful analysis, deconstructing the discourse in ways that help us re-construct the perfect response.
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood
Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.
Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.
Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.
