Home > Review Articles > Medical education and training > Asking the difficult questions: Building the capacity of community paediatricians to routinely enquire and respond to family violence

Asking the difficult questions: Building the capacity of community paediatricians to routinely enquire and respond to family violence

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This Australian research group reviewed the literature for data on family violence education programmes and evidence‐based family violence screening tools. They then developed a series of six education sessions, which were delivered to physicians at the Community Paediatric and Child Health Service (CPCHS) in Canberra. These sessions were designed with the aim of enhancing the confidence and capacity of community paediatricians and paediatric trainees to identify and respond to family violence. An audit was performed on the charts of all new referrals to the CPCHS over an 18-month period prior to the education sessions and for 5 months following the education sessions. The documented rate of enquiry into family violence at CPCHS increased 4-fold from 24% in the retrospective chart audit to 60% following the education sessions (OR 4.7; p<0.05). In addition, the documented rate of disclosure of family violence increased 2-fold, from 13% of all new patients in the retrospective chart audit to 24% following the education sessions (OR 2.1; p<0.05). A questionnaire distributed after the education sessions revealed that all participants routinely enquired about family violence and were comfortable enquiring about family violence.

Comment:
I’ve had difficulties enquiring about family violence with whānau. However, attending the training and having the standard questions/guidelines has been immensely useful. I now understand the contexts or environments in which family violence is more likely to occur (stress, poverty, housing issues), that whānau have a right to live their lives free of violence, and that I have an important role addressing the upstream ‘risks’ and preventing the downstream effects.
Reference: J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54(3):234-7
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Policies developed with a reproductive justice methodology are crucial for ensuring reproductive autonomy and safety

Māori experience culturally unsafe pre-hospital care, according to a Kaupapa Māori study. Semi structured interviews

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.