Home > Review Articles > Mortality > Reductions in national cardiometabolic mortality achievable by food price changes according to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) eligibility and participation

Reductions in national cardiometabolic mortality achievable by food price changes according to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) eligibility and participation

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This comparative risk analysis sought to quantify how food pricing policies to subsidise healthy foods and tax unhealthy foods could affect US cardiometabolic disease (CMD) mortality, overall and by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) eligibility and participation. The researchers obtained national data on diet from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2003–2012) and mortality, using records from the mortality-linked National Health Interview Survey, and meta-analyses of policy-diet and diet-disease relationships. Calculations revealed that a national 10% price reduction on fruits, vegetables, nuts and whole grains could prevent an estimated 19,600 CMD deaths/year, including 2.6% of all CMD deaths among SNAP participants, 2.7% among SNAP-eligible non-participants and 2.6% among SNAP-ineligible nonparticipants. Moreover, adding a national 10% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages and processed meats would prevent 33,700 CMD deaths/year, including 5.9% of all CMD deaths among SNAP participants, 4.8% among SNAP-eligible non-participants and 4.1% among SNAP-ineligible non-participants. Adding a SNAP-targeted 30% subsidy for the same healthy foods would offer the largest reductions in both CMD mortality and disparities.

Comment:
I’ve been part of a research project for Māori and Pacific people with type 2 diabetes. An important part of the programme is linking whānau with social support. Our data shows that the majority of the ‘social’ referrals have been to the local foodbank. So I found these two papers incredibly useful, demonstrating that ‘foodbanks’ can empower whānau beyond just putting kai on the table (which is important in itself); and that I can advocate for more to be done ‘upstream’.
Reference: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(9):817-24
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Rural-urban disparities in mortality in younger age groups cannot be explained by ethnicity or socioeconomic

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.