Home > Review Articles > Cancer > Health system costs for individual and comorbid noncommunicable diseases: an analysis of publicly funded health events from New Zealand

Health system costs for individual and comorbid noncommunicable diseases: an analysis of publicly funded health events from New Zealand

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

These researchers analysed nationally linked data for all publicly funded health expenditure (including hospitalisation, outpatient, pharmaceutical, laboratory testing, and primary care) on 6 noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) listed as cancer, CVD, diabetes, musculoskeletal, neurological, and chronic lung, liver, or kidney disease, for New Zealand adults between 1 July 2007 and 30 June 2014. The data yielded 18.9 million person-years and a total health expenditure of $US26.4 billion ($US calculated in 2016). The analysis compared the costs of having ≥2 NCDs versus those expected from the independent costs of each NCD. It also disaggregated total health spending by NCDs across age and by sex. Around two-thirds (59%) of health expenditure was on NCDs and nearly one-quarter (23.8%) of all health expenditure on chronic NCDs was explained by costs relating to ≥2 diseases (i.e. costs due to comorbid conditions, exceeding the sum of having the diseases separately). Excess comorbidity costs for patients with 2 diseases were higher for younger-aged versus for older-aged patients; e.g. excess expenditure for 45–49-year-old males with CVD and chronic lung, liver, or kidney disease was 10 times higher than for 75–79-year-old males and 6 times higher for females. The remaining three-quarters of health expenditure was broken down as follows across the 6 NCDs (as though they were the only disease to affect a person): heart disease and stroke, 18.7%; musculoskeletal, 16.2%; neurological, 14.4%; cancer, 14.1%; chronic lung, liver, or kidney disease, 7.4%; and diabetes, 5.5%.

Comment:
Following on from the previous paper, this study demonstrates the complex nature of comorbidity on costs and the fact that funding is not allocated equitably to areas that generate most cost (neurological and musculoskeletal conditions). Again, a major re-think on what drives the distribution of health funding is required, starting perhaps with our own biases about what is important.
Reference: PLoS Med. 2019;16(1):e1002716
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

A review of a regional diabetes service in Auckland has highlighted an increasing incidence of

Māori and Pacific peoples experience inequities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment, according to a

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.