Home > Review Articles > Access to care > The impact of the introduction of a point-of-care haematology analyser in a New Zealand rural hospital with no onsite laboratory

The impact of the introduction of a point-of-care haematology analyser in a New Zealand rural hospital with no onsite laboratory

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This evaluation assessed the impact of introducing point-ofcare (POC) haematology testing in Hokianga Hospital, a small rural hospital in the far north of New Zealand serving a predominantly Māori population of 6,500 people. POC biochemistry has been available at the hospital since 2010, but it lacks an onsite laboratory. This 3-part investigation was conducted at Hokianga Hospital over 4 months in 2016. In Part 1, hospital doctors completed a form before and after POC haematology testing, recording test indication, differential diagnosis, planned patient disposition and impact on patient treatment. In Part 2, focus group interviews were conducted with hospital doctors, nurses and a cultural advisor. Part 3 of the study involved an analysis of cost versus tangible benefits. Analysis of the 97 POC haematology tests (97% were performed during the acute clinical presentation; 72% were performed out of hours) revealed a significant reduction in the average number of differential diagnoses, from 2.43 pre-testing to 1.7 post-testing (p<0.05). Haematology POC testing was also associated with significant reductions in the number of patients transferred and significantly increased the number of patients discharged home (both p<0.05). Analyses of the interview transcripts revealed 3 key themes: impact on patient management, challenges, and the commitment to ‘make it work’. POC haematology positively impacted patient management and clinician confidence, mainly by increasing diagnostic certainty. Respondents cited challenges surrounding the testing as issues relating to the hidden costs of implementing the analyser and its associated quality assurance programme in a remote-from-laboratory setting. A cost– benefit analysis demonstrated savings in healthcare costs.

Comment:
Useful for those of you considering, or arguing for, POC in your areas.
Reference: Rural Remote Health 2019;19(2):4934
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

A retrospective study has highlighted ethnic disparities in the utilisation of epidural analgesia at Christchurch

A survey of health practitioners across New Zealand has highlighted inadequate staffing and provision of

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.