Home > Review Articles > Ethnic disparities > New Zealand health system: universalism struggles with persisting inequities

New Zealand health system: universalism struggles with persisting inequities

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

These researchers discuss the history of New Zealand’s health system, which was originally established as a universal, tax-funded national health service. They go on to describe how this universal orientation and strong commitment to social service delivery has contributed to favourable health statistics in this country and the establishment of unique institutions that have arisen in response to the needs of New Zealanders. These include innovative Māori services, a no-fault accident compensation scheme, and the Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC), which negotiates with pharmaceutical companies to provide funded access to medicines purchased using public money. Nevertheless, the system is marred by persisting problems with access to care and an inability to deliver the promise of equitable health outcomes for all population groups. Structural changes during the 1990s have failed to deliver the expected efficiency gains and the system’s prioritisation of individual-level secondary services and performance targets have obscured the focus that is needed to address issues such as suicide, obesity, and poverty-related diseases through community-based health promotion, preventive activities, and primary care. The researchers reflect upon what changes are needed in order to strengthen the culture and capacity of the system and thereby achieve equity of access and outcomes for all population groups. In particular, the researchers suggest that the healthcare system expands the provision of Māori health services, integrates existing services and structures with new ones, aligns resources with need to achieve pro-equity outcomes, and strengthens population-based approaches to better deal with contemporary drivers of health status.

Comment:
A number of readers have specifically requested this paper. As the main author points out, “For a small country, [New Zealand’s health] system is complex and fragmented, and this contributes to inequity and inefficiency”. Since the publication of this article, we’ve had the release of the interim report on health (https://systemreview.health. govt.nz/interim-report/) confirming the article’s findings. I encourage readers to look at both.
Reference: Lancet. 2019;394(10196):432-42
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Despite overall improvement in life expectancy in New Zealand, according to a cause-specific decomposition analysis

A retrospective study has highlighted ethnic disparities in the utilisation of epidural analgesia at Christchurch

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.