Home > Review Articles > Health economics > Evaluation of a rural primary-referred cardiac exercise tolerance test service

Evaluation of a rural primary-referred cardiac exercise tolerance test service

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This paper documents the feasibility, clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of a local clinician-led Exercise Tolerance Test (ETT) service provided through Ministry of Health Rural Innovation Funding for two rural communities (Rawene in Northland and Dunstan in Central Otago) over 12 months from September 2011. Over the study period, 33 ETTs were performed at Rawene Hospital and 202 at Dunstan Hospital. An audit of ETT reports that calculated the direct costs of the service including doctor and nurse time, equipment costs, consumables, and cardiologist/physician oversight revealed that the cost per test at both Rawene ($200.00) and Dunstan ($132.50) was considerably less than the national price of $281.13 in 2012 (community referred tests-cardiology). Nearly all of the patients referred to these rural services would otherwise have been referred to specialist cardiology services. Instead, the majority of patients (83% at Dunstan and 70% at Rawene) did not require onward referral to specialist services; the ETT result enabled the GP to continue to manage the patient in primary care. In cases where the ETT indicated specialist treatment, this was provided in a timely manner. The study researchers conclude that this collaborative approach to delivering ETT services in rural communities is sustainable, cost effective, improves access for rural patients and may help overcome inequities across New Zealand in terms of access to cardiac investigations and early, appropriate treatment.

Comment:
As the authors suggest, this particular intervention has the potential to address inequities in access to investigations of best practice. As a GP, I also like the idea of more timely access to both specialist and primary health care.
Reference: N Z Med J. 2014;127(1406):63-70
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

A retrospective study has highlighted ethnic disparities in the utilisation of epidural analgesia at Christchurch

A survey of health practitioners across New Zealand has highlighted inadequate staffing and provision of

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.