Home > Review Articles > Measuring potentially avoidable and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalisations in New Zealand children using a newly developed tool

Measuring potentially avoidable and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalisations in New Zealand children using a newly developed tool

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This paper describes a novel tool designed to measure Potentially Avoidable (PAH) and Ambulatory Care Sensitive (ACSH) Hospitalisations in New Zealand children. The study examined whether the PAH and ACSH can clarify if policies or programmes addressing the underlying determinants of health (e.g. poor housing, exposure to cigarette smoke, child poverty) reduce hospitalisations in this age group. Data consisted of all acute and semi acute (<1 week of referral) hospitalisations in New Zealand children aged 29 days–14 years during 2000–2009, as well as all hospitalisations for selected dental conditions. The PAH and ACSH determined category membership; explanatory variables included age, gender, ethnicity and NZ Deprivation index decile. During 2005–2009, 47.4% of all acute paediatric hospitalisations were categorised as PAH, 34.3% as ACSH and 9.7% as non-avoidable. A further 42.9% were grouped as non-classified conditions. Dental conditions and gastroenteritis were the leading causes of both PAH and ACSH. PAH and ACSH were highest in infants and one-year-olds, while non-avoidable hospitalisations were more evenly distributed throughout childhood. PAH and ACSH were higher for those from deprived areas and for Pacific and Māori children. Socioeconomic differences for non-avoidable hospitalisations were less marked, with rates being lowest in Māori and Asian children

Comment:
These new tools aimed to include wider determinants of health (e.g. housing, deprivation, etc.) and to be more ‘child-specific’ (with the removal of adult conditions and treatments). Whilst many suggest ‘better primary care’ will address high and disparate rates in PAH, the authors have attempted to define what this means (i.e. access to immediate and after-hours primary care, better quality of primary care) as well as highlighting the need to evaluate the capacity of primary care to further buffer the effects of worsening socioeconomic circumstances on hospital admission rates.
Reference: N Z Med J 2012;125(1366):38-50
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.