Home > Review Articles > From Great to Good; how a leading New Zealand DHB lost its ability to focus on equity during a period of economic constraint

From Great to Good; how a leading New Zealand DHB lost its ability to focus on equity during a period of economic constraint

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This report is a review of the Capital and Coast District Health Board (C&CDHB) decision-making processes and frameworks around primary health care and health equity between 2009 and 2012, based on the release of relevant papers requested under the Official Information Act. The review describes a lack of control by the Board over decentralised functions such as primary health care, as well as its losing battle to maintain equity as a high-level goal in the face of operational decisions inconsistent with this goal, as the Board attempts to live within a period of economic restraint. The Board is embarking on a new strategy, Integrated Care Collaboratives, in an attempt to reverse the current trends of increased hospital admissions and decreased support for the primary care sector. However, “this approach will struggle while the national signals remain tightly focused on the hospital sector, and whole system performance and complexity is not seriously considered in the way the system is led”, concludes the review.

Comment:
Although this report was commissioned by stakeholders and may be seen as having particular bias, the author provides clear evidence on the need to have ‘equity’ as a driver for health planning and funding decisions. I was particularly interested in the statement that “New Zealand does not have an equitable health system, despite its policy framework. A recent Treasury report 1 shows an upper middle class household receives on average almost $11,000 of health services a year, whereas the households with the lowest income receive on average $6,000 of health services – despite their greater need.” 1. Treasury. Budget 2012 Information Release Release Document June 2012. In: Treasury T, editor.; 2012
Reference: Wellington: Centre for Public Health Research. 2013.
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.