Home > Review Articles > A community-based model of care improves blood pressure control and delays progression of proteinuria, left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction in Māori and Pacific patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial

A community-based model of care improves blood pressure control and delays progression of proteinuria, left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction in Māori and Pacific patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

The efficacy of a novel, integrated, community-based model of care using culturally appropriate health-care assistants to manage hypertension in Māori and Pacific patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) was compared with that of conventional care in achieving blood pressure (BP) targets and delaying progression of cardiac and renal end-organ damage. The study cohort consisted of 65 Māori and Pacific patients (aged 47–75 years) with type 2 diabetes, moderate CKD (>0.5 g proteinuria/day, serum creatinine 130–300 μmol/L) and hypertension, who were randomised to usual care (n=32) or community/ intervention care (n=33) for 12 months. Community care patients were visited monthly by a nurse-led health care assistant for BP measurement. By 12 months, the community care patients had achieved a significantly greater reduction in office systolic BP (−21 mmHg vs −12 mmHg; p=0.04) and in 24h urine protein (−1.4 g vs +0.1 g; p=0.04). The number of prescribed antihypertensives was greater in these patients at 12 months (3.4 vs 2.3; p<0.01). Left ventricular mass and left atrial volume progressed in the usual care group, but not in the intervention group.

Comment:
I think key factors in the success of this ‘intervention’ are (1) the Māori and Pacific health worker (referred to as a health care assistant in the paper); (2) the health care assistants working closely with nurse leaders; (3) integrated care across primary and secondary services including communication between providers; (4) the ‘education package’ about hypertension and reasons for medication and; (5) regular contact.
Reference: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(10):3260-6.
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.