Home > Review Articles > Ethnic disparities > Changing smoking-mortality association over time and across social groups: National census-mortality cohort studies from 1981 to 2011

Changing smoking-mortality association over time and across social groups: National census-mortality cohort studies from 1981 to 2011

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

The authors of this New Zealand case study state that the difference in mortality between current and never-smokers varies over time, affecting future projections of health gains from tobacco control. They used New Zealand census data to examine this heterogeneity by sex, ethnicity and cause of death on absolute and relative scales. The data included smoking status, which the researchers linked to subsequent mortality records for 25–74-year olds over 3 time periods spanning 30 years: 1981–84; 1996–99; and 2006–11. The analysis yielded 16.1 million personyears of follow-up. Age-standardised mortality rates and rate differences (SRDs) were calculated for current and never-smokers. The analysis identified a decline in mortality over time in never-smokers, whereas mortality trends varied by sex, ethnicity and cause of death among current smokers. SRDs were stable over time in European/Other men, moderately widened in European/Other women and markedly increased in Māori men and women. In Poisson regression analyses adjusting for multiple socioeconomic factors and household smoking, smoking-mortality rate ratios (RRs) increased from 1981–84 to 1996–99 and there was a moderate increase from 1996–99 through to 2006–11 (RRs of 1.48, 1.77, 1.79 in men and 1.51, 1.80, 1.90 in women, respectively). Socioeconomic confounding also increased over time.

Comment:
The authors found that although smoking-related deaths in ischaemic heart disease (IHD) reduced for NZ European people over time, they increased in Māori men and women, suggesting that “Māori are both earlier in the tobacco epidemic and have experienced slower declines in never smoker IHD mortality rates”. They suggest that tobacco control interventions are prioritised for Māori health gain, with a focus on those proven effective (tobacco tax, smoking cessation services) as well as innovative ideas (see the next paper).
Reference: Sci Rep. 2017;7:11465
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

An Australian national preterm birth prevention programme led to meaningful reductions in preterm and early-term

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.