Home > Review Articles > Child and youth health > Clinical management and patient persistence with antibiotic course in suspected group A streptococcal pharyngitis for primary prevention of rheumatic fever: the perspective from a New Zealand emergency department

Clinical management and patient persistence with antibiotic course in suspected group A streptococcal pharyngitis for primary prevention of rheumatic fever: the perspective from a New Zealand emergency department

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This retrospective audit included all suspected group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis admissions to Whangarei Hospital’s Emergency Department between 1 May 2016 and 31 August 2016. The investigation primarily aimed to assess how well patients adhere to antibiotic treatment for possible strep throat. It also examined prescriber adherence to the national antibiotic guideline for sore throat management. Electronic medical records were searched for patient demographics, clinical examination findings, investigations and antibiotic prescription. Patients were contacted and 75 who consented to a telephone interview were questioned about their antibiotic treatment. While all patients were discharged on the recommended medication, only 62 (82.7%) were prescribed the correct length (10 days) of oral antibiotics. Of the 61 patients (81%) who had a swab taken, 25 (41%) were confirmed positive for GAS. Patients were either advised to commence medication without waiting for a swab result (n=72; 96%) or delay treatment and commence only if no improvement in symptoms (n=3; 4%). Of those advised to commence medication immediately, 67 (94%) obtained their medication from a community pharmacy. Three patients were advised to stop treatment after confirmation of a negative result. Of the 65 patients assessable for medication persistence, 48 (73.8%) were compliant in completing their full course of antibiotics.

Comment:
I was disappointed about the cessation of prescribed targets in rheumatic fever. However, let’s focus on those DHBs, including Northland, who trialled innovative programmes such as that described here. Qualitative evidence from Northland and Auckland found that the issue wasn’t with the patient presenting with sore throat/taking medication but with GP clinics who did not follow guidelines. A programme run through ED is an excellent idea.
Reference: N Z Med J. 2017;130(1457):58-68
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Rangatahi Māori have successfully co-created a set of eating and wellbeing guidelines for New Zealand

A survey of health practitioners across New Zealand has highlighted inadequate staffing and provision of

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.