Home > Review Articles > Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study): a prospective population-based sequential comparison

Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study): a prospective population-based sequential comparison

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This investigation assessed the effect of urgent assessment and early initiation of existing treatments on the risk of early recurrent stroke in patients presenting with a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke. The investigators conducted a prospective before (phase 1: April 1, 2002, to Sept 30, 2004) versus after (phase 2: Oct 1, 2004, to March 31, 2007) study of the effect on process of care and outcome of more urgent assessment and immediate treatment in clinic, rather than subsequent initiation in primary care, in all patients with TIA or minor stroke not admitted direct to hospital. The study was nested within a rigorous populationbased incidence study of all TIA and stroke (Oxford Vascular Study; OXVASC), with identical methods of case ascertainment, investigation, and follow-up for both phases. Of 1278 OXVASC patients presenting with TIA or stroke (634 in phase 1 and 644 in phase 2), 607 were referred or presented direct to hospital, 620 were referred for outpatient assessment (591 [95%] to the study clinic), and 51 were not referred to secondary care. The median delay to assessment in the study clinic was reduced from 3 days in phase 1 to >1 day in phase 2, and median delay to first prescription of treatment decreased from 20 days to 1 day. The 90-day risk of recurrent stroke in the patients referred to the study clinic was significantly reduced from 10·3% in phase 1 to 2·1% in phase 2. The reduction in risk was not related to age or sex, and early treatment was not associated with an increased risk of intracerebral haemorrhage or other bleeding.

Comment:
An important finding as it provides strong evidence that: 1. Specialist stroke clinic for management of minor stroke in the outpatient setting is effective (reduced risk for stroke, no increase in adverse events) 2. Organised stroke care (defined in the NZ Stroke Guidelines as timely and coordinated care with stroke expertise) including an outpatient clinic is critical 3. The care pathway or process of care also improves (reduced time to see specialist, reduced time for medical intervention) with a change in service delivery structure. DHBs must apply the findings of such studies in order to deliver ‘best practice’ care.
Reference: Lancet. 2007;370:1432-42
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.