Home > Review Articles > Rheumatic fever > Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study

Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This investigation used a multiple baseline design that followed the 77 participants (aged 14–21 years) with RF for a period of 15 months (3 months prior to intervention and 12 months afterwards). The study researchers sought to determine whether an incentive programme consisting of a mobile phone and monthly “top-up” (for data/calls) increased the number of secondary prophylaxis injections, increased texts/calls with nurses, reduced the number of visits to get a successful injection, less medicine wasted, and increased nurse satisfaction, compared to the baseline period prior to the intervention. All study participants were enrolled in an acute RF registry in the Waikato region and were classified by the number of injections at baseline as either fully adherent (all injections received and ≤1 late) or partially adherent. Following the intervention, injections were markedly increased and slightly decreased over time in the partially adherent cohort (p=0.003), while those classified as fully adherent maintained their high rate of injections. There was a similar pattern for satisfaction among the district nurses, who expressed higher rates of satisfaction with fully adherent patients than with those in the partially adherent cohort and, while nurses’ satisfaction for fully adherent patients fell slightly over time, satisfaction with partially adherent patients increased sharply post-intervention and then fell slightly over time (p=0.001). There was a significant increase throughout the intervention in the number of calls/texts placed by nurses to the partially adherent patients (p=0.003). The number of visits made by nurses fell over time with partially adherent patients and increased over time with fully adherent patients (p=0.012). The overall incremental cost-effectiveness for the 12-month study period was $NZ989 per extra successful injection.

Comment:
Great to see a health delivery intervention being tested. The importance of supporting a good relationship between the clinical team and patient/whānau is also highlighted here.
Reference: BMC Public Health 2019;19:385
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Rangatahi Māori have successfully co-created a set of eating and wellbeing guidelines for New Zealand

A New Zealand study has highlighted elevated levels of poverty, trauma, and mental health distress

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.