Home > Review Articles > Literature review > Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review

Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This US-based study sought to determine the extent to which implicit racial/ethnic bias exists among health care professionals and examine the relationships between health care professionals’ implicit attitudes about racial/ethnic groups and health care outcomes. The study explains that implicit attitudes are thoughts and feelings that often exist outside of conscious awareness, and thus are difficult to consciously acknowledge and control. Such attitudes are often automatically activated and can influence human behaviour without conscious volition. A search of 10 computerised bibliographic databases identified 15 studies for review, almost all of which used cross-sectional designs, convenience sampling, US participants, and the Implicit Association Test to assess implicit bias. In 14 studies, there was evidence of low to moderate levels of implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals; similar implicit bias scores to those in the general population. Levels of implicit bias against Black, Hispanic/Latino/Latina, and dark-skinned people were relatively similar across these groups. Although some associations between implicit bias and health care outcomes were nonsignificant, results also showed that implicit bias was significantly related to patient–provider interactions, treatment decisions, treatment adherence, and patient health outcomes. Implicit attitudes were more often significantly related to patient-provider interactions and health outcomes than treatment processes.

Comment:
An excellent paper providing further evidence of implicit bias in healthcare; and the subsequent impacts on health outcomes. I’m interested in learning more about effective interventions.
Reference: Am J Public Health. 2015;105(12):e60-76
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

A national cross-sectional survey of 7359 Māori individuals has shown that a culturally aligned, methodological

A case study of Twitter/X quotes (or tweets) on the Three Waters political reform used

This commentary article curated sets of excuses for racism within the health sector in New

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.