Home > Review Articles > Mental health services > Metabolic monitoring in New Zealand district health board mental health services

Metabolic monitoring in New Zealand district health board mental health services

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This audit sought to determine policies adopted by NZ DHBs for monitoring metabolic parameters for people with serious mental disorders treated with second-generation antipsychotic medications. Such medications can contribute to metabolic complications and are associated with weight gain, increased triglyceride levels, reduced HDL levels and impaired glucose metabolism. After reviewing the current literature and published guidelines relevant to metabolic syndrome, the study researchers proposed a best practice guideline, combining the 2009 ‘harmonised’ definition developed by international cardiac and metabolic health organisations, with recommendations for frequency of monitoring. All 20 DHBs and one private clinic participated in the audit, which analysed metabolic monitoring policies in relation to the best practice standard. Fourteen DHBs were found to have a metabolic monitoring policy. There was considerable variation among the policies as to size (number of pages) of policies, the extent of information about metabolic syndrome contained in the policies, and their clarity when being implemented by clinicians. Only 2 of the 14 policies included a complete set of cut-off values, consistent with the literature-based guideline. Eight policies specify actions to be taken when consumers meet criteria for metabolic syndrome. Four DHBs have systems for measuring their rates of metabolic monitoring. The study researchers recommend that the Ministry of Health adopt a best practice standard in this area, and require DHBs to report against this standard.

Comment:
An excellent example of a clinical audit. The next step though is to improve quality of care. Other questions for me included the role of primary care in this space, and whether a similar audit has occurred for smoking ABC.
Reference: N Z Med J. 2017;130(1465):44-52
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

A nationwide cohort study has demonstrated a high mortality rate amongst people transferred from prison

A study of New Zealand’s District Health Board (DHB) reform between 2000 and 2022 found

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.