Home > Review Articles > Movers and stayers: The geography of residential mobility and CVD hospitalisations in Auckland, New Zealand

Movers and stayers: The geography of residential mobility and CVD hospitalisations in Auckland, New Zealand

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This study investigated the association between residential mobility and cardiovascular disease hospitalisations in Auckland, New Zealand. The study researchers used an encrypted National Health Index number to link individual-level data recorded in routine health datasets (e.g., Primary Health Organisation [PHO] registrations, pharmaceutical dispensing, hospitalisations and mortality) to construct a cohort of approximately 670,000 patients aged ≥30 years old living in Auckland, between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2012. Residential mobility was measured by changes in the census Meshblock of usual residence, obtained from the PHO database for every calendar quarter of the study period. The NZDep2006 area deprivation score at the start and end of a participant’s inclusion in the study was used to measure deprivation mobility. In multivariable binomial regression models that controlled for age, gender, deprivation and ethnicity, movers were 1.22 times more likely than stayers to be hospitalised for CVD. Using the 5 × 5 deprivation origin-destination matrix to model a patient’s risk of CVD based on upward, downward or sideways deprivation mobility, movers within the least deprived (NZDep2006 Quintile 1) areas were 10% less likely than stayers to be hospitalised for CVD, while movers within the most deprived (NZDep2006 Quintile 5) areas were 45% more likely than stayers to have had their first CVD hospitalisation in 2006–2012 (RR 1.45). Participants who moved upward also had higher relative risks of having a CVD event, although their risk was lower than those observed for participants experiencing downward deprivation mobility.

Comment:
The Auckland population seems to be very mobile, in my experience as a researcher and GP here. If my experience is ‘real’, then this study is particularly interesting and would perhaps support calls for ‘virtual’ medical records that patients and their providers can access from anywhere.
Reference: Soc Sci Med. 2015;133:331-9
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.