Home > Review Articles > Patient preference and racial differences in access to renal transplantation

Patient preference and racial differences in access to renal transplantation

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

A stratified sample of patients aged 18 to 54 (n = 1,392) with end stage renal disease were interviewed with regard to their views on transplantation and experiences with medical care 10 months after beginning maintenance treatment with dialysis. Follow-up continued for up to 4 years. Fewer black than white patients wanted to receive a transplant; for women, 76.3 vs 79.3% respectively; for men 80.7 vs 85.5 respectively. Black patients were also less certain about their preference. Rates of referral to a transplantation centre were significantly lower for black patients (50.4 vs. 70.5% for women, 53.9 vs 76.2% percent for men; both p < 0.001), as were rates of placement on a transplant waiting list (31.3 vs. 56.5% for women, and 35.3 vs. 60.6% for men; both p < 0.001). There was no effect of factors including preferences and expectations about transplantation, sociodemographic characteristics, the type of dialysis facility, perceptions of care, health status, the cause of renal failure, and the presence or absence of coexisting illnesses on the significance of these results.

Comment:
The authors of this paper have examined possible reasons for the lower rates of renal transplantation in African American compared with White patients in the US. Fortunately the research looked at both patient preference AND provider factors and found that more of the ethnic disparity was explained at the ‘Provider level’. We hear the same claims from clinicians here in NZ that Mäori prefer not to receive donated organs on the basis of our ‘culture’. Yet there is little evidence to confirm such claims. In fact, anecdotal stories from Mäori suggest that clinicians play an important role in deciding whether or not a person goes onto transplant waiting lists. As the authors state, doctors should ensure that people who desire transplantation are fully informed and referred for evaluation.
Reference: N Engl J Med 1999. 25; 341(22):1661-9
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.