Home > Review Articles > Child and youth health > Understanding the structure and processes of primary health care for young indigenous children

Understanding the structure and processes of primary health care for young indigenous children

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

These researchers audited records from 1,554 annual child health records that included quality of care data from 74 remote, rural and urban primary health care services throughout Queensland, the Northern Territory, South Australia and Western Australia participating in Australia’s Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease (ABCD) programme (a continuous quality improvement programme) between 2012 and 2014. All services completed the Systems Assessment Tool (SAT), developed in 2005 as a way for indigenous health services to assess their health care systems and improve their quality of care. The analysis sought to determine whether an association exists between social and emotional wellbeing, anaemia and child neurodevelopment process of care indicators (PoCIs) for young indigenous children (aged between 3 months and 14 years at the audit date) and (i) primary health care service and child characteristics, and (ii) organisational health service structures. Approximately onethird (32%) of the records had a social and emotional wellbeing PoCI, over half (56.6%) had an anaemia PoCI and almost half (49.3%) had a child neurodevelopment PoCI. When adjusted logistic regression models were fitted to the data and clustered for health services, it was found that children aged 12–23 months were significantly more likely to receive all PoCIs compared with children aged 24–59 months. The analysis also revealed that certain items in the SAT delivery system design component were associated with the process of care provided for anaemia: every 1-point increase in assessment scores for team structure and function (aOR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.27) and care planning (aOR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.29) items increased the odds of having an anaemia PoCI by 14%. In contrast, system assessment scores were not associated with social and emotional wellbeing PoCIs or child neurodevelopment PoCIs.

Comment:
An important paper for my primary care colleagues, supporting the need for organisational level measures to monitor process and quality of care, as well as equity (in this case there were clear differences by age) in receipt of service and health outcomes.
Reference: J Prim Health Care. 2018;10(3):267-78
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Rangatahi Māori have successfully co-created a set of eating and wellbeing guidelines for New Zealand

A survey of health practitioners across New Zealand has highlighted inadequate staffing and provision of

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.