Home > Review Articles > Indigenous perspectives > Neoliberalism and indigenous knowledge: Māori health research and the cultural politics of New Zealand’s “National Science Challenges”

Neoliberalism and indigenous knowledge: Māori health research and the cultural politics of New Zealand’s “National Science Challenges”

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

New Zealand’s Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) rapidly implemented a major restructuring of national scientific research funding in 2012–13. The “National Science Challenges” (NSC) initiative aims to promote greater commercial applications of scientific knowledge, reflecting ongoing neoliberal reforms in New Zealand. These researchers analysed the texts of MBIE documents about the NSC from 2012–14, materials circulated by Māori researchers in the blogosphere in 2014, and data from ethnographic interviews conducted in 2013 with 17 Māori health researchers working in university-based research centers, government agencies, or independent consultancies. Through 2013, NSC rhetoric and practice moved to marginalise participation by Māori researchers, in part through constructing “Māori” and “science” as essentially separate arenas – yet at the same time the NSC appeared to recognise and value culturally distinctive forms of Māori knowledge. Māori health researchers contested this “neoliberal multiculturalism” by reasserting the validity of culturally distinctive knowledge, strategically appropriated NSC rhetoric, and marshalled political resources to protect Māori research infrastructure. The paper holds that by foregrounding scientific knowledge production as an arena of contestation over neoliberal values and priorities and scrutinising how neoliberalising tactics can include moves to acknowledge cultural diversity, new questions arise for social scientific study of global trends toward reconfiguring the production of knowledge about health.

Comment:
The authors travelled to Aotearoa and interviewed a number of kaupapa Māori researchers, including me, for this study. Those of us involved in the NSC continue to experience the tensions of wanting to make a positive contribution to Māori knowledge/environment/health through excellent research, aware that we are working within a paradigm that doesn’t feel ours.
Reference: Soc Sci Med. 2016;150:57-66
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

Increased participation in lung cancer screening among Indigenous peoples requires leveraging of positive experiences and

Decentralised clinical trials allow patients to remain in their local area with whānau and support

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.