Home > Review Articles > Stroke > Race/ethnicity, quality of care, and outcomes in ischemic stroke

Race/ethnicity, quality of care, and outcomes in ischemic stroke

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

This study obtained data from a registry base consisting of 1181 nationwide hospitals participating in the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG) program. The researchers analysed information on 397,257 patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Relative to white patients, black and Hispanic patients were younger and more often had diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Patient- and hospital-level adjusted analyses revealed that blacks were less likely to receive care as measured by the GWTG program, including use of tissue plasminogen activator soon after arriving at the emergency department, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, smoking cessation, discharge antithrombotics, anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation, and lipid therapy. The odds of dying in-hospital were higher for black patients than for white and Hispanic patients. Whites and Hispanics received similar levels of care and had similar in-hospital mortality. However, during the course of the study, 2003 to 2008, adherence to the stroke treatment guidelines improved at similar rates for all three race/ethnicity groups.

Comment:
Another study from the ‘Get with the Guidelines Program’ in the United States. It is important to note that unequal treatment of stroke by ethnicity may contribute to increased risk for recurrent stroke and consequently to ethnic disparities in stroke outcomes (disability, death). Quality of care improved for all ethnicities when clinicians were supported to deliver ‘best practice care’ through implementation of clinical guidelines. Such evidence confirms the need to continue a focus on clinical decision making in order to improve quality of care and reduce ethnic disparities.
Reference: Circulation. 2010;121(13):1492-501
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

The adoption of ethical, culturally attuned research frameworks in epigenetics to support Māori health advancement

Ethnicity reporting in New Zealand-based randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is inadequate and non-standardised, according to

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.