Home > Review Articles > Mortality > Geographical and ethnic differences of osteoarthritis associated hip and knee replacement surgeries in New Zealand: a population-based cross-sectional study

Geographical and ethnic differences of osteoarthritis associated hip and knee replacement surgeries in New Zealand: a population-based cross-sectional study

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

The regional and ethnic differences in rates of publicly funded osteoarthritis (OA)-associated hip and knee replacement surgeries and mortality after surgery were explored in this New Zealand populationbased, retrospective, cross-sectional study. A total of 53,439 publicly funded primary hip replacements and 50,072 publicly funded primary knee replacements with a diagnosis of OA were identified between 2005 and 2017 in patients aged 14-99 years. Increases in the number and age-standardised rates of hip and knee replacements were seen over the time period, with Māori having the highest age-standardised rate of hip replacements, followed by European/others and Pacific peoples; Asians had the lowest rate. Pacific peoples had the highest age-standardised rate of knee replacements, followed by Māori and European/others, while Asians again had the lowest rate. The lowest rates of hip and knee surgeries were seen in the Northern Health Network and the Southern Health Network, respectively. Standardised mortality ratios decreased over the time period and were lower than in the general population: 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.95) for hip and 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.82) for knee surgery recipients. 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality patterns were similar to the standardised mortality ratios.

Comment:
Although the authors report higher age-standardised rates of hip replacements for Māori, this should be considered in the context of Māori having higher rates of OA; having diagnosis at younger average age; experiencing delays to surgery; and having worse symptoms at presentation. It is pleasing to see that surgery is associated with better life expectancy, and as others have reported, equity in quality of life measures.
Reference: BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e032993
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

The experiences of individuals involved in the community pharmacist-led KneeCAPS trial were captured in a

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.