Home > Review Articles > Socioeconomic inequalities > Geography matters: the prevalence of diabetes in the Auckland Region by age, gender and ethnicity

Geography matters: the prevalence of diabetes in the Auckland Region by age, gender and ethnicity

Making Education Easy

Authors:
Summary:

These researchers used General Electoral Districts (GEDs) to identify and map geographical variations in diagnosed diabetes in the greater Auckland Region for the year 2011. Encrypted National Health Identifiers and record linkage of routine health datasets revealed an estimated 63,014 people with diagnosed type 1 or type 2 diabetes in Auckland in 2011, representing 8.5% of the adult population aged ≥30 years. The geographical unit of a person’s residence (meshblock) was used to determine the GED of residence. Diabetes prevalence varied significantly by age, gender, ethnicity and GED; in unadjusted analyses, the prevalence was more than 5-fold higher in Mangere (17.3%) as compared with in the North Shore (3.2%). Such variations remained after binary logistic regression adjusting for sociodemographic variables. Compared to New Zealand Europeans, Indian people had the highest odds of having diabetes at 3.85, while the odds of people living in the most deprived areas having diabetes was nearly twice that of those living in least deprived areas (OR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.87 to 1.99). Geographic variations in diabetes remained after adjusting for sociodemographic circumstances: people living in GEDs in south-west Auckland were at least 60% more likely than people living in the North Shore GED to have diabetes.

Comment:
Really interesting findings for those of us working in Auckland. Although I suspect similar disparities exist in most places (i.e. Hamilton, greater Wellington, Hawkes Bay, etc.). I agree that access to healthy food in local neighbourhoods will be important, as will access to safe areas for activity. Although the authors suggest that the differences persisted after controlling for variables such as ethnicity, I can’t help thinking that institutionalised racism is in some way contributing to these geographic differences.
Reference: N Z Med J. 2016;129(1436):25-37
Independent commentary by Dr. Matire Hardwood

Dr Matire Harwood (Ngapuhi) has worked in Hauora Māori, primary health and rehabilitation settings as clinician and researcher since graduating from Auckland Medical School in 1994. She also holds positions on a number of boards, committees and advisory groups including the Health Research Council. Matire lives in Auckland with her whānau including partner Haunui and two young children Te Rangiura and Waimarie.

Research Review publications are intended for New Zealand health professionals.

Disclaimer: This publication is not intended as a replacement for regular medical education but to assist in the process. The reviews are a summarised interpretation of the published study and reflect the opinion of the writer rather than those of the research group or scientific journal. It is suggested readers review the full trial data before forming a final conclusion on its merits.

Related Articles

The adoption of ethical, culturally attuned research frameworks in epigenetics to support Māori health advancement

Ethnicity reporting in New Zealand-based randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is inadequate and non-standardised, according to

Explore Māori Health Reviews

Dive into our publications and videos content from over 50 areas of medicine including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, Haematology and Psychiatry. 

It looks like you are closest to our Australia site.

Australia
Australia
Find Reviews in Your Clinical Area
Please select your country of practice.
Terms and Conditions

Website terms of use 

By using our website, you agree to follow these terms and conditions. 

 

Privacy policy 

We take your privacy seriously. To understand how we collect, use, and protect your information, please read our Privacy Policy, which is part of these terms. 

 

Copyright and use of website content 

The content of our website is protected by copyright, trademarks, and other legal rights. You can: view, download, or print a single copy of content for your personal or professional use. 

You cannot:  copy, modify, or distribute website content, or use our website content for commercial purposes or in other works without permission. 

 

Links to third-party websites 

The Research Review website may link to third-party websites for your convenience. However: 

We do not endorse or approve their products, services, or actions. 

We are not responsible for their content or how they operate. 

There is no formal partnership between us and third parties unless we clearly state otherwise. 

 

Disclaimer and limitation of liability 

We do our best to keep the information on our website accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is always correct or up to date. 

To the fullest extent allowed by law, we are not responsible for: 

Any loss, damage, or costs you may suffer from using (or being unable to use) our website. 

Any decisions you make based on the information provided. 

Any business losses, such as lost profits, lost data, or business interruptions. 

 

Governing law 

These terms are governed by New Zealand law. If there is a dispute, it must be resolved in a New Zealand court.